Journal Home
Search for

Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 379-385 (September 2009)


View previous. 10 of 23 View next.

Efficacy of Neopectoral Pocket in Revisionary Breast Surgery

G. Patrick Maxwell, MD1, Shawn A. Birchenough, MD2, Allen Gabriel, MDCorresponding Author Information1email address

Accepted 25 June 2009.

Background

An increasing number of patients present today with volume-depleted breasts from large saline or silicone gel–filled implants most commonly placed under the pectoral muscle. Revisionary (secondary or tertiary) surgeries are performed for late complications of breast augmentation, such as implant extrusion, gel bleed, rupture with extravasation of the gel, saline implant deflation, capsular contracture, palpability, rippling, “double- bubble,” “Snoopy breast,” symmastia, and implant malposition. Because most patients undergoing revisionary surgery in the past decade presented with subglandular implants, little has been published regarding the treatment of revisionary surgery in patients with subpectoral implants.

Objective

The authors describe the efficacy of a new technique for the management of late breast augmentation (augmentation mastopexy) complications.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all consecutive patients who underwent revisionary breast surgery with the creation of a neopectoral pocket. Data were collected regarding the presenting complaints, original augmentation date, original implant location, revision date, type of implant used for revision, incision used in revision, length of follow-up, and any ensuing complications.

Results

There were 198 patients who underwent revisionary surgery with the creation of a neopectoral pocket over a four-year period. Patients' presenting complaints involved concerns related to either capsular contractures or implant malposition. Only three of 198 patients required reoperation for complications.

Conclusions

The neopectoral pocket is a new type of site change operation. This procedure will address many of the issues seen today in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery for subpectoral implants that are already in place. These are frequently large implants that have displaced medially, inferomedially, inferiorly, or are encapsulated. (Aesthet Surg J;29: 379-385.)

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Allen Gabriel, MD, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11175 Campus St., #21126, Loma Linda, CA 9235

 Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of California Society of Plastic Surgeons, Dana Point, CA, June 5–8, 2008, and the 24th Annual Meeting of Breast Surgery Symposium, Atlanta, GA, January 17, 2008.

DISCLOSURES

Dr. Maxwell is a paid consultant to Allergan. The other authors have no financial interest in and receive no compensation from manufacturers of products mentioned in this article.

1 Dr. Maxwell is Clinical Professor of Surgery and Dr. Gabriel is the Director of Research in the Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA.

2 Dr. Birchenough is a plastic surgeon in private practice in Greenville, SC.

PII: S1090-820X(09)00323-9

doi:10.1016/j.asj.2009.08.012


View previous. 10 of 23 View next.